Home
Photography Classes
Photography Colleges
Photography Courses
Photography Degree
Photography Schools 1
Photography Schools 2
Site Map
Digital Photography, More Tech Than Imaging ?

Looking at the latest flurry of discussions among Canon users regarding Nikon's latest Digital SLR offering I can only conclude that with digital camera owners it is more about tech than photography. As soon as a digital camera with a higher spec gets released nearly every owner of a "lesser" body wants an upgrade. Photography is about making images, the photographic industry is not the microprocessor industry, although certain companies are striving to make one into the other.

300D owners up in arms and in quotes:

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1031&message=7448549


---------------------

-You'd see the same flurry, maybe to a lesser degree, when a new film body was introduced, too. I'd agree, though, with digiheads, the specs are the thing, not the photograph. But a digihead is distinct from a photographer, or a digital photographer. The new Nikon interests me because of its price, flash exposure comp, selectable metering and spot meter, all of which the RebelD lack, and the 10D lacks spot meter, which I use a lot.

-In defense of SOME digiheads...who actually ARE interested in the photograph... Digital photography is unique in that the body determines far more about the colors, clarity, and rendition of a scene than film cameras do. Film bodies rely on...FILM...for color, resolution (grain), and white balance (tungsten, etc.), ISO characteristics, etc. When you change a digital body, you are effectively changing th eequivalent of ALL of those things, which, for the film shooter, would mainly only require the consideration of shich film to use on a given subject.

 


Submit your comment or answer